Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Maxime Cressy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Cressy analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Maxime Cressy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Cressy
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 48.69% of points on his second serve, while Cressy has won 50.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 48.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cressy has won 47.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.02% and 31.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 59.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cressy has saved 61.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 47.27% of matches played (W/L 26/ 29), with Cressy winning 49.15% (W/L 29/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Cressy has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 78/ 44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 18/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Cressy has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 19/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Cressy winning 1. The last match between Zandschulp and Cressy was at the Western & Southern Open - Cincinnati, 14-08-2022, First, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Cressy have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Cressy 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Cressy 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.69 while Cressy has played against players with an average rank of 259.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cressy has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 38.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cressy has converted 38.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Cressy
112
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
169
Rank
31
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
63% (332-197)
Career Total W/L
57% (232-172)
43% (12-16)
YTD W/L
61% (17-11)
$2,900,825
Career Prize Money
$1,658,705
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Cressy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Maxime Cressy |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:54 | 2:1:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (54/85) | 53% (42/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (34/54) | 71% (30/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (19/31) | 37% (14/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (36/80) | 38% (32/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Cressy H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Maxime Cressy
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
7
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
18
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Maxime Cressy |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (12/16) | 61% (17/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (27/36) | 59% (39/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (295/325) | 53% (350/309) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 58% (11/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 1.07 |
| Aces Total | 120 | 345 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.76 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 245 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:44 | 1:53:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.79 | 282.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1234/1962) | 58% (1188/2042) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (845/1234) | 78% (931/1188) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (350/728) | 50% (429/854) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (68/176) | 38% (69/181) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (751/1968) | 37% (771/2087) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 55% (6/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 71% (10/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (12/26) | 61% (17/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 42% (5/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 79% (19/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 21% (19/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 6% (16/1) | 22% (9/2) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxime Cressy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Maxime Cressy
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Maxime Cressy
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Yuta Shimizu
50%
(
61 of
121)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
123)
19
Aces
3
17
Double Faults
4
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
47%
(
28 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
43 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
123)
124
Total Points Won
120
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Mark Lajal
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
9
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
8
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Hiroki Moriya
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
10
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Maxime Cressy
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
90)
4
Aces
22
5
Double Faults
13
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Alexis Galarneau
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
14
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Cressy Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
